A carrier scorecard rates each provider with per-shipment indicators (appointment compliance, evidence delivered, billing accuracy, claims, load acceptance) weighted by what hurts your operation. Its value is not the quarterly report: it is using it live to assign (the top score gets the load) and with data to renegotiate (premium rate needs premium performance, or it does not). Without a scorecard, assignment is habit and the most insistent salesperson.
- base indicators
- 8
- suggested rate weight
- 5%
- performance weight
- 95%
- data-led assignment
- Live
For finance, rate weighs little versus daily performance: accessorials, failures, and deductions often turn the best rate into the worst total cost.
Cluster: invoice audit · control tower · assignment
Eight indicators and suggested weights
OTP, load acceptance, billing accuracy, complete evidence, claims, fiscal docs, exception communication, and rate competitiveness. Each comes from per-shipment evidence, not surveys.
Scorecard: 8 metrics · suggested weights
Rate 5%, performance 95%: rate is annual; performance bills every day.
Three rules that make it work
Fed by evidence, not surveys. Automatic consequences (A/B/C bands). Transparent to the carrier. What is measured in secret gets disputed; what is shared improves.
Three rules so the scorecard works
Select a step to see detail
Step detail · 01
Evidence
Per trip
Live assignment with the scorecard
Top scores get load and payment priority; B gets a timed improvement plan; C leaves the tariff. Connect the scorecard to assignment and the control tower so exceptions feed the rating.
Renegotiate on total cost, not anecdotes
If your best rate is your worst score, add accessorials, failures, and deductions: the best rate often stops being best. Use the scorecard in the tender and annual review.
Where each data point comes from
Appointment + GPS, acceptance in assignment, per-invoice audit, POD, incidents and insurance, fiscal CFDI/Carta Porte validation. Without those sources, the scorecard is filled by hand and measures personal relationships.
What OCL runs
OCL Cargo is an autonomous TMS with agents and computer use (operate screens and portals like an analyst). Per-shipment audit feeds the scorecard without manual work and makes bands visible for assignment and renegotiation. Coexists without day-one migration; humans on exceptions. OCL can stamp invoices and Carta Porte when the flow requires it.
Pre-pay
Scorecard that feeds itself
Capture
Evidence
Audit
Invoice
Score
Per shipment
Assign
With data
6–8 week pilot
Turn on 5–8 indicators on last-quarter core carriers and apply consequence bands by month 2. Metric: % of freight to the top quartile and billing leakage from the worst quartile.
Elige un paso para ver el detalle
Detalle del paso · 01
Weights agreed with finance and operations
Key takeaways5 points
- Scorecard = per-shipment indicators, not quarterly anecdotes.
- Suggested weight: ~5% rate, ~95% performance.
- Three rules: evidence, consequences, transparency to the carrier.
- Use it live to assign and with data to renegotiate.
- Per-shipment audit feeds the scorecard without manual fill.
Does a scorecard or habit decide your assignment?
Related reading
Frequently asked questions
Data per shipment (continuous); consequence bands monthly or quarterly. Annual review is for renegotiation, not day-to-day management.
From 5 providers it already orders decisions; at 20+ it is essential, because nobody truly remembers who is good at that scale.
That is exactly the finding the scorecard exists to show: add accessorials, failures, and deductions and the best rate often stops being best. Total cost, always.
No. Transparency improves performance and retains good carriers in a scarce-capacity market. Secrecy gets disputed.
Per-shipment audit feeds indicators without manual fill and leaves bands ready for assignment. 6–8 week pilot.